REALISTIC DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE SAMPLE TEST ONLINE - DATABRICKS CERTIFIED GENERATIVE AI ENGINEER ASSOCIATE ACTUAL TEST FREE PDF QUIZ

Realistic Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample Test Online - Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Actual Test Free PDF Quiz

Realistic Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample Test Online - Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Actual Test Free PDF Quiz

Blog Article

Tags: Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample Test Online, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Actual Test, Relevant Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Objectives Pdf, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Dumps Free

With the qualification certificate, you are qualified to do this professional job. Therefore, getting the test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification is of vital importance to our future employment. And the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study tool can provide a good learning platform for users who want to get the test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associatecertification in a short time. If you can choose to trust us, I believe you will have a good experience when you use the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guide, and you can pass the exam and get a good grade in the test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
  • similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 2
  • Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
  • licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 3
  • Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 4
  • Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample Test Online <<

Prominent Features of CramPDF Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Practice Test Questions

Many don't find real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions and face loss of money and time. CramPDF made an absolute gem of study material which carries actual Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions for the students so that they don't get confused in order to prepare for Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam and pass it with a good score. The Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice test questions are made by examination after consulting with a lot of professionals and receiving positive feedback from them.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q52-Q57):

NEW QUESTION # 52
A Generative AI Engineer is developing an LLM application that users can use to generate personalized birthday poems based on their names.
Which technique would be most effective in safeguarding the application, given the potential for malicious user inputs?

  • A. Reduce the time that the users can interact with the LLM
  • B. Implement a safety filter that detects any harmful inputs and ask the LLM to respond that it is unable to assist
  • C. Increase the amount of compute that powers the LLM to process input faster
  • D. Ask the LLM to remind the user that the input is malicious but continue the conversation with the user

Answer: B

Explanation:
In this case, the Generative AI Engineer is developing an application to generate personalized birthday poems, but there's a need to safeguard againstmalicious user inputs. The best solution is to implement asafety filter (option A) to detect harmful or inappropriate inputs.
* Safety Filter Implementation:Safety filters are essential for screening user input and preventing inappropriate content from being processed by the LLM. These filters can scan inputs for harmful language, offensive terms, or malicious content and intervene before the prompt is passed to the LLM.
* Graceful Handling of Harmful Inputs:Once the safety filter detects harmful content, the system can provide a message to the user, such as "I'm unable to assist with this request," instead of processing or responding to malicious input. This protects the system from generating harmful content and ensures a controlled interaction environment.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Reduce Interaction Time): Reducing the interaction time won't prevent malicious inputs from being entered.
* C (Continue the Conversation): While it's possible to acknowledge malicious input, it is not safe to continue the conversation with harmful content. This could lead to legal or reputational risks.
* D (Increase Compute Power): Adding more compute doesn't address the issue of harmful content and would only speed up processing without resolving safety concerns.
Therefore, implementing asafety filterthat blocks harmful inputs is the most effective technique for safeguarding the application.


NEW QUESTION # 53
A Generative Al Engineer is building a production-ready LLM system which replies directly to customers.
The solution makes use of the Foundation Model API via provisioned throughput. They are concerned that the LLM could potentially respond in a toxic or otherwise unsafe way. They also wish to perform this with the least amount of effort.
Which approach will do this?

  • A. Ask users to report unsafe responses
  • B. Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses.
  • C. Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text
  • D. Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task is to prevent toxic or unsafe responses in an LLM system using the Foundation Model API with minimal effort. Let's assess the options.
* Option A: Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses
* Llama Guard is a safety-focused model designed to detect toxic or unsafe content. Hosting it via the Foundation Model API (a Databricks service) integrates seamlessly with the existing system, requiring minimal setup (just deployment and a check step), and leverages provisioned throughput for performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Foundation Model API supports hosting safety models like Llama Guard to filter outputs efficiently"("Foundation Model API Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text
* Using additional LLM calls (e.g., prompting an LLM to classify toxicity) increases latency, complexity, and effort (crafting prompts, chaining logic), and lacks the specificity of a dedicated safety model.
* Databricks Reference:"Ad-hoc LLM checks are less efficient than purpose-built safety solutions" ("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses
* Regex can catch simple patterns (e.g., profanity) but fails for nuanced toxicity (e.g., sarcasm, context-dependent harm), requiring significant manual effort to maintain and update rules.
* Databricks Reference:"Regex-based filtering is limited for complex safety needs"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option D: Ask users to report unsafe responses
* User reporting is reactive, not preventive, and places burden on users rather than the system. It doesn't limit unsafe outputs proactively and requires additional effort for feedback handling.
* Databricks Reference:"Proactive guardrails are preferred over user-driven monitoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Option A (Llama Guard on Foundation Model API) is the least-effort, most effective approach, leveraging Databricks' infrastructure for seamless safety integration.


NEW QUESTION # 54
A Generative Al Engineer is deciding between using LSH (Locality Sensitive Hashing) and HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) for indexing their vector database Their top priority is semantic accuracy Which approach should the Generative Al Engineer use to evaluate these two techniques?

  • A. Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
  • B. Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs
  • C. Compare the Recall-Onented-Understudy for Gistmg Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
  • D. Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task is to choose between LSH and HNSW for a vector database index, prioritizing semantic accuracy.
The evaluation must assess how well each method retrieves semantically relevant results. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs
* Cosine similarity measures semantic closeness between vectors, directly assessing retrieval accuracy in a vector database. Comparing returned results' embeddings to test inputs' embeddings evaluates how well LSH or HNSW preserves semantic relationships, aligning with the priority.
* Databricks Reference:"Cosine similarity is a standard metric for evaluating vector search accuracy"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* BLEU evaluates text generation (e.g., translations), not vector retrieval accuracy. It's irrelevant for indexing performance.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU applies to generative tasks, not retrieval"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Compare the Recall-Oriented-Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* ROUGE is for summarization evaluation, not vector search. It doesn't measure semantic accuracy in retrieval.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is unsuited for vector database evaluation"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs
* Levenshtein distance measures string edit distance, not semantic similarity in embeddings. It's inappropriate for vector-based retrieval.
* Databricks Reference: No specific support for Levenshtein in vector search contexts.
Conclusion: Option A (cosine similarity) is the correct approach, directly evaluating semantic accuracy in vector retrieval, as recommended by Databricks for Vector Search assessments.


NEW QUESTION # 55
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system which will answer questions on latest stock news articles.
Which will NOT help with ensuring the outputs are relevant to financial news?

  • A. Incorporate manual reviews to correct any problematic outputs prior to sending to the users
  • B. Implement a comprehensive guardrail framework that includes policies for content filters tailored to the finance sector.
  • C. Increase the compute to improve processing speed of questions to allow greater relevancy analysis C Implement a profanity filter to screen out offensive language

Answer: C

Explanation:
In the context of ensuring that outputs are relevant to financial news, increasing compute power (option B) does not directly improve therelevanceof the LLM-generated outputs. Here's why:
* Compute Power and Relevancy:Increasing compute power can help the model process inputs faster, but it does not inherentlyimprove therelevanceof the answers. Relevancy depends on the data sources, the retrieval method, and the filtering mechanisms in place, not on how quickly the model processes the query.
* What Actually Helps with Relevance:Other methods, like content filtering, guardrails, or manual review, can directly impact the relevance of the model's responses by ensuring the model focuses on pertinent financial content. These methods help tailor the LLM's responses to the financial domain and avoid irrelevant or harmful outputs.
* Why Other Options Are More Relevant:
* A (Comprehensive Guardrail Framework): This will ensure that the model avoids generating content that is irrelevant or inappropriate in the finance sector.
* C (Profanity Filter): While not directly related to financial relevancy, ensuring the output is clean and professional is still important in maintaining the quality of responses.
* D (Manual Review): Incorporating human oversight to catch and correct issues with the LLM's output ensures the final answers are aligned with financial content expectations.
Thus, increasing compute power does not help with ensuring the outputs are more relevant to financial news, making option B the correct answer.


NEW QUESTION # 56
A Generative Al Engineer interfaces with an LLM with prompt/response behavior that has been trained on customer calls inquiring about product availability. The LLM is designed to output "In Stock" if the product is available or only the term "Out of Stock" if not.
Which prompt will work to allow the engineer to respond to call classification labels correctly?

  • A. You will be given a customer call transcript where the customer inquires about product availability.
    Respond with "In Stock" if the product is available or "Out of Stock" if not.
  • B. Respond with "In Stock" if the customer asks for a product.
  • C. You will be given a customer call transcript where the customer asks about product availability. The outputs are either "In Stock" or "Out of Stock". Format the output in JSON, for example: {"call_id":
    "123", "label": "In Stock"}.
  • D. Respond with "Out of Stock" if the customer asks for a product.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The Generative AI Engineer needs a prompt that will enable an LLM trained on customer call transcripts to classify and respond correctly regarding product availability. The desired response should clearly indicate whether a product is "In Stock" or "Out of Stock," and it should be formatted in a way that is structured and easy to parse programmatically, such as JSON.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Respond with "In Stock" if the customer asks for a product. This prompt is too generic and does not specify how to handle the case when a product is not available, nor does it provide a structured output format.
* Option B: This option is correctly formatted and explicit. It instructs the LLM to respond based on the availability mentioned in the customer call transcript and to format the response in JSON.
This structure allows for easy integration into systems that may need to process this information automatically, such as customer service dashboards or databases.
* Option C: Respond with "Out of Stock" if the customer asks for a product. Like option A, this prompt is also insufficient as it only covers the scenario where a product is unavailable and does not provide a structured output.
* Option D: While this prompt correctly specifies how to respond based on product availability, it lacks the structured output format, making it less suitable for systems that require formatted data for further processing.
Given the requirements for clear, programmatically usable outputs,Option Bis the optimal choice because it provides precise instructions on how to respond and includes a JSON format example for structuring the output, which is ideal for automated systems or further data handling.


NEW QUESTION # 57
......

You can get a reimbursement if you don't pass the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate. This means that you can take the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) with confidence because you know you won't loose any money if you don't pass the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam. This is a great way to ensure that you're investing in your future in the correct way with Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Actual Test: https://www.crampdf.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam-prep-dumps.html

Report this page